An Evaluation Framework for Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage

Main Article Content

Dinusha Vatsalan
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6713-7667
Peter Christen
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-2015
Christine M. O'Keefe
Vassilios S. Verykios
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-7551

Abstract

Privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) addresses the problem of identifying matching records from different databases that correspond to the same real-world entities using quasi-identifying attributes (in the absence of unique entity identifiers), while preserving privacy of these entities. Privacy is being preserved by not revealing any information that could be used to infer the actual values about the records that are not reconciled to the same entity (non-matches), and any confidential or sensitive information (that is not agreed upon by the data custodians) about the records that were reconciled to the same entity (matches) during or after the linkage process. The PPRL process often involves three main challenges, which are scalability to large databases, high linkage quality in the presence of data quality errors, and sufficient privacy guarantees. While many solutions have been developed for the PPRL problem over the past two decades, an evaluation and comparison framework of PPRL solutions with standard numerical measures defined for all three properties (scalability, linkage quality, and privacy) of PPRL has so far not been presented in the literature. We propose a general framework with normalized measures to practically evaluate and compare PPRL solutions in the face of linkage attack methods that are based on an external global dataset. We conducted experiments of several existing PPRL solutions on real-world databases using our proposed evaluation framework, and the results show that our framework provides an extensive and comparative evaluation of PPRL solutions in terms of the three properties.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vatsalan, Dinusha, Peter Christen, Christine O’Keefe, and Vassilios Verykios. 2014. “An Evaluation Framework for Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage”. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.v6i1.636.
Section
Articles