Maximizing Utility for Vector-weighted Pseudo Posterior Mechanisms under Differential Privacy

Main Article Content

Jingchen Hu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-181X
Terrance Savitsky
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-3106
Matthew Williams
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-1240

Abstract

The risk-weighted pseudo posterior mechanism provides a practical framework for privacy protection that takes advantage of the availability of posterior sampling approaches, creating a synthesizer for microdata dissemination. The flexibility of the approach lies in the user-specification of the individualized risks and the mapping of risks to weights. However, this raises the question of which weighting approach is optimal. In this work, we develop a recursive approach to algorithmically induce an optimal weighting strategy given an initial suboptimal strategy. This ` re-weighting' strategy applies to any vector-weighted pseudo posterior mechanism under which a vector of observation-indexed weights are used to downweight likelihood contributions for high disclosure risk records. We demonstrate our method on two different vector-weighted schemes that target high-risk records (one close to optimal and one not). Our new method for constructing record-indexed downweighting maximizes the data utility under any privacy budget for the vector-weighted synthesizers by adjusting the by-record weights, such that their individual risk contributions (e.g. Lipschitz bounds) approach the risk bound for the entire database. Our method achieves an epsilon-asymptotic differential privacy (aDP) guarantee, globally, over the space of databases. We illustrate our methods using simulated highly skewed count data and compare the results to a scalar-weighted synthesizer under the popular Exponential Mechanism (EM). We also apply our methods to a sample of the Survey of Doctorate Recipients and demonstrate the practicality of our methods.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hu, Jingchen, Terrance Savitsky, and Matthew Williams. 2026. “Maximizing Utility for Vector-Weighted Pseudo Posterior Mechanisms under Differential Privacy”. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.979.
Section
Articles